f682aff184 1978, 9, 1019. 122153. Rev. This change may be partly related to a population redistribution process in which urban regions have continued to grow and rural forest areas to decline, leading to an increased distance between people and forests. Management is generally increased in intensity to achieve either economic criteria (increased timber yields, non-timber forest products, ecosystem services) or ecological criteria (species recovery, fostering of rare species, carbon sequestration).[8]. A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Not only will the owners be younger, but they will also have different education levels, occupations, etc., which may influence the objectives of forest ownership [18]. Soc. J.
The chosen focus on attitudinal factors does not disregard the fact that there are other important causal factors, not covered within the scope of the present study, such as contextual factors in a wider sense, personal capabilities, and habits [20].The effect of different socio-demographics on the values-beliefs-attitude relationship was controlled in the study. Forest values, defined in line with the above-mentioned three-way distinction, have been studied within forest research [18]. Hengeveld 3, Torgny Lind 4, William L. Psychol. Balenovich, A. From the small woodland problem to ecosocial systems: The evolution of social research on small-scale forestry in Sweden and the USA. Pers. Mental and biophysical terrains of biodiversity: Conservation of oak woodland on family forests.
Vancal replied
470 weeks ago